|
Monday, January 25. 2010Edithburgh Sun Shots - Leafy In The SunlightTrackbacks
Trackback specific URI for this entry
No Trackbacks
Comments
Display comments as
(Linear | Threaded)
Hello Robert,
very nice. I am really interested what you do with the NEXUS 160 Dome. I have a Nexus 5d and this dome but only used it a few times so far with the CANON 15mm FE. I tried to get it working with a 16-35mm usm II but have to less time / and hardware to try. Currently i am to far away from the water. Nevertheless since I have at the moment a Panoramic head I am able to at least identify the Nodal point and could more accurate. please let me know more about your experience with the NEXUS gear
Hello Matthias,
Thanks for visiting my photo-blog. I have only been diving with the Nexus housing for a few months but I think I have learned enough to be able to help. I assume you already have read my post on the FP160 dome, http://robertrath.com/serendipity/archives/114-Nexus-Underwater-Housing-With-Canon-EF-17-40mm-Zoom.html For the sake of these comments I will assume your 16-35mm USM II will behave similar to my 17-40mm. My first attempts using the 17-40 with the 40mm extension were very bad as expected for the smallest apertures. Increasing the extension to 60mm and using +2 diopter produces quite good results but at a loss of angle of view (now equivalent to 20- 50). This this is not the sweet spot. Attempting to use 70mm extention resulted in very bad vignetting which even +4 was not able to remove ( I did not try any higher as I wanted to avoid stacking diopters ). The fundamental problem is that the FP160 dome (with no extension) is designed to work with 180deg FE lenes such as the Canon or Sigma 15mm FEs and relies on the FE optics to compensate for the misalignment of radius centre to entry pupil. This misalignment results in two effects, a) additional stretching of the peripheral image and b) some distortion in the shape of the focal plane (curved surface in the case of domes). FE lenses cope with these distortions very well where are rectilinear lenses do not. The advantage of the FP160 being shallow cut (ie not a full half hemisphere) is good close focus wide angle performance. A secondary problem is poor close focus performance with the 80mm dome radius. For the 17-40mm lens to really work well and I assume the 16-35 USM II as well I feel that a larger diameter dome, at least 200mm ( addresses close focus performance issues ) and a more complete hemisphere ( addresses entry pupil alignment ) would be needed to get these rectilinear wide zoom lenses to work well. You will have to look at third party products such as http://zenunderwater.com if you want to go down this route. Hope this helps! ...Robert
Hi Robert
My friend and I are planning to dive Whyalla to dive with the cuttlefish in mid June and would like to also dive with some Leafy Dragons. I have seen them at Rapid Bay several times, they are my favourite marine creature. My friend dived Rapid a few weeks ago and saw none. What dive site do you recommend Rapid BAy or Edithburgh. Your assistance in this matter is much appeaciated We are from Melbourne thanks Karen |
Subscribe To My PostsMy Networking SitesTwitter UpdatesCalendar
QuicksearchCategoriesBlog Administration |